In a short but telling discussion, a large number of delegations yesterday condemned Japan’s proposal to award a quota to their small type coastal whaling scheme.
Once again, Japan trotted out its old arguments that small coastal communities like Taiji have “suffered” due to the whaling moratorium. Critics pointed out that while the town may well have suffered when the moratorium was put into place—that was twenty-five years ago. Get over it!
Japan’s representative noted Japan had supported the aboriginal subsistence whaling proposals before the Commission earlier and that its small type coastal whaling had “a lot in common” with the ASW proposals. Except of course that Japan’s whaling industry is a modern conceit distributing whale meat all over the country in stores and has little to do with “aboriginal” people or “subsistence.”
Speakers against the proposal (including Mexico, Chile, Brazil, Cyprus representing the EU, the US, New Zealand, and Australia) repeatedly underscored the scheme as a violation of the moratorium on commercial whaling and a step in exactly the wrong direction for the IWC.
Japan beat a hasty retreat from the opposition, but hold open the item (like the Greenland proposal on Tuesday) for further consideration by the IWC over the next couple of days. As Japan’s whaling would require a three-fourths vote to amend the schedule, prospects for success appear poor.